B.RAMAN
There are no saints in matters relating to visas.
And there are no heroes either.
2.We should avoid an immature and juvenile song and
dance over the refusal of a visa by the Pakistani High Commission in New Delhi
to Shri Praveen Swami, who heads the Delhi office of “The Hindu”, to enable him
to accompany Shri S.M.Krishna, our Foreign Minister, during his just concluded
visit to Pakistan.
3. Travel visa is not a fundamental or human right.
Countries have a right to refuse visas to individuals and they don’t have to
give reasons for their refusal. Visas are often refused by all countries of the
world on unadmitted political or national security grounds.
4. After we carried out our nuclear tests in 1998,
our retired nuclear scientists wanting to travel to the US found it impossible
to get a US visa. A retired Chairman of our Atomic Energy Commission found that
the US Embassy in New Delhi, without saying no, sat over his application for a
visa to attend a non-governmental conference in the US. He took the hint and
withdrew his application.
5. Another retired nuclear scientist could not get
a visa from the US Embassy in New Delhi because he had once visited Iran after
retirement.
6. We are not trail-blazers in this matter. We can
be as over-restrictive as any other country in the consideration of visa
applications from journalists and academics. We have not only refused visas to
journalists and academics---even from the US, our strategic partner--- but even
harassed one or two after issuing them visas and allowing them to work from New
Delhi.
7. A typical example is that of Alex Perry, the New
Delhi correspondent of the “Time” magazine, when Shri A.B.Vajpayee was the
Prime Minister. We issued him a visa to report from New Delhi, but when one of
his reports was perceived to be uncharitably critical of Shri Vajpayee, the NDA
Government had him harassed and humiliated through the Foreigners’ Regional
Registration Office on some ground or the other.
8.We have refused visas to journalists and
academics from the ASEAN countries because of our adverse perception of their
views relating to the Pakistani sponsorship of terrorism against India.
9. For a journalist, refusal of visa by a foreign
country is an occupational hazard. Praveen and the rest of the country should
take it in our stride instead of projecting it as one more instance of
Pakistani cussedness towards India.
10. Praveen is one of our well-known reporters on
Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. There are others too who report on this subject,
but they were issued visas to go with our Foreign Minister. One has an
impression that the Pakistanis are unhappy with his reporting and TV interviews
on Pakistani sponsorship of terrorism because they feel he is vicious in his
reporting and interviews. We may not agree with this, but it is their
perception.
11. Some ill-informed analysts have criticised the
journalists, who had accompanied our Foreign Minister, for not raising the
refusal of the visa to Praveen. One of the analysts has pointed out that only
Ms Sheela Bhatt, the Executive Editor, Rediff, had the courage to raise it
during her interactions in Islamabad.
12. Kudos to Sheela for her professional courage, but the fact that other journalists
did not raise it does not make them professional cowards. If they feel the
refusal of visa to Praveen is a matter between Pakistan and “The Hindu”, one
cannot blame them. They had a job to do in reporting on the FM’s visit and their
focus was on the larger dimension of their visit to Pakistan.
13.When the NDA Government harassed and humiliated
Alex, other foreign journalists based in Delhi did not rush to his defence. There
is now a slanging match between our PMO and the “Washington Post” on a negative
report on Prime Minister Dr.Manmohan Singh sent by its correspondent in New
Delhi. Other foreign journalists in New Delhi are discreetly following the
controversy without getting actively involved in it.
14.If at all foreign newspapers find it necessary
to take a stand in such matters, their headquarters will do it and not
individual journalists. ( 10-9-12)
(The writer
is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi,
and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate
of the Chennai Centre For China Studies. E-mail: seventyone2@gmail.com Twitter @SORBONNE75)
1 comment:
Why does any impartial observer of your blog get the idea that you wouldn't have posted this in first place if Barkha Dutt was not part of the Journalist team that traveled to Pakistan with SM Krishna. Off late you seem to be working full time defending her. Sir you are much respected, please refrain from defending the indefensible (not in this case), but there are cases when you have done it!
Post a Comment