B.RAMAN
The
intelligence agencies would have examined in depth the likely security
implications of the execution of Afzal Guru this morning for his involvement in
the attack on the Indian Parliament in December,2001, and taken necessary
precautions not only in Jammu and Kashmir, but also in the rest of India.
2.They would have studied in detail the kind of
security problems our agencies faced after the execution of Maqbool Bhatt of
the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front in the Tihar Jail in 1984 for his
involvement in terrorism.
3. The circumstances in 1984 were not as
complicated as they are today. We had to contend with only dangers of
retaliation by the Kashmiri terrorist organisations.
4.In 1984, we were not faced with dangers of
possible retaliation by Pakistani jihadi organisations such as the Lashkar-e-Toiba,
the Jaish-e-Mohammad, the Harkat-ul-Mujahideen. They were busy fighting the
Soviet troops in Afghanistan and the attention of Pakistan’s Inter-Services
Intelligence was also in Afghanistan.
5.They were not in a position to mount instant
retaliation. Their retaliation was delayed till 1989 after the Soviet troops
had withdrawn from Afghanistan.
6.Today, all these groups, particularly the LET and
the JEM which played a principal role in the attack on the Parliament, are well
primed against India and are in a position to mount quick retaliatory attacks
not only in J&K but also in the rest of India with the help of their accomplices
such as the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) and the Indian
Mujahideen.
7.Our security focus has to be pan-India. (9-2-13)
( The writer is former Additional Secretary ,
Cabinet Secretariat, Govt of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director,
Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate, Chennai Centre For China
Studies. Twitter: @SORBONNE75 )