B.RAMAN
Shri Ratan Tata, Chairman of the Tata Group of
companies, has made some interesting remarks on India’s relations with China in
an interview with Bloomberg UTV. Extracts of the interview can be seen at http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-china-a-second-class-enemy-could-be-a-strong-ally-ratan-tata/20120709.htm
2. He has been quoted inter alia as saying:" No,
I am not worried (about China). I wish we could find a way to be allies with
China. I would prefer to use China as a very strong ally, to forge a
relationship with China which would be a sustaining one and I think it could be
done. India-China relationship is not
adversarial, but it is not the best. You know China has never done anything
adversarial to India. China has of course been assisting and arming Pakistan,
which is like a red flag to India, and that already makes it a second class
enemy."
3.His remarks may be read in continuation of my
article of June 6,2012 titled “THE JUGULAR REALITY: INDIA’S STRATEGIC DEBATE”
available at http://www.c3sindia.org/india/2932
4. According to a report carried by the “Times of
India” on June 30,2012, “ Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) has announced that
its Chinese subsidiary, TCS China, has been listed among the '2012 Top 10
Global Service Providers in China.' The award was presented by the China
Council for International Investment Promotion (CCIIP) in an award ceremony
held at Nanjing, China.”
5. Speaking at the function, Qiqi
Dong, CEO, TCS China, said: "We will continue to strengthen relationships
with our local and multinational customers and we will keep building the right
infrastructure to help drive China's full potential as a global player in IT
services, outsourcing and consulting."
6. TCS, Infosys and Reliance are among the Indian
companies that have been doing well in their business relations with China. The
TCS web site says: “Having pioneered the Global Delivery Network Model, TCS
commenced its China operations in 2002, bringing its three decades of domain
experience. In 2005, TCS established a landmark joint venture in Beijing with
the Chinese Government, which is considered as the role model for Chinese IT
industry. Currently, TCS has three Global Delivery Centers (GDC) in China
(Beijing, Hangzhou and Shanghai) operating at the highest quality standards.
TCS has also invested in a number of technology centers in China.”
7.In the strategic debate presently on in the
country to which I had drawn attention in my article, the views and assessment
of Shri Tata have to be given importance. At the same time, one should not overlook
the growing business interests of the TCS in China.
8. India has reasons to be gratified by the
excellent name that the TCS has made in China, its winning the trust of the
Chinese Government and public and the expansion of its presence in China. The
increasing presence of Indian business houses in China will definitely help us
in expanding our economic relations with China and in improving the
State-to-State and people-to-people trust level between the two countries. One
has to salute the TCS for what it has already achieved in China and wish it
more success.
9. At the same time, our respect and admiration for Shri Tata
should not distort the strategic debate
and induce self-complacency in our national security related decisions
vis-à-vis China. No Indian national security manager can afford to overlook the
conscious role being played by China in strengthening Pakistan’s nuclear and
missile capabilities, its ambivalence, if not double standards, on the question
of sovereignty over Jammu & Kashmir,
its strengthening its military capabilities in Tibet and its insistence on
changing the status quo in Arunachal Pradesh. The deadlock in the negotiations
over the border dispute is largely attributable to its waiting for the day when
it can force upon us a change in the status quo.
10. There is no historical enmity between India and
China. We do not find in China and its Armed Forces the kind of anti-India
mindset that we find in Pakistan and its Armed Forces. China does not fight shy
of admitting its cultural and civilisational links with India and has not been
rewriting its history to erase references to such links as Pakistan, its rulers
and many of its scholars have been doing.
11. Intrinsically, there is no reason why India and
China should not be able to get closer together provided China changes those
aspects of its policies on Pakistan which
India sees as directed against its national and strategic interests. So
long as it does not do so and so long as it does not show a more accommodating
stand on the border dispute, we have to treat China in our national security
planning and strategizing as a country of major concern.
12.We paid a heavy price for neglecting our
national security interests in our
relations with China when Jawaharlal Nehru was the Prime Minister. We should
not repeat that folly.
13. Yes, it is in the mutual interest to continue
to strengthen the economic relations. Yes, it is necessary to increase the
trust level between the two countries. But just as China all the time keeps in
view what it calls its core interests in its policy-making towards India, we
should all the time keep in view our core interests in our policy-making
towards China.
14.I have been an advocate of improving even our
security co-operation with China in certain fields such as maritime security
and maritime counter-terrorism and counter-piracy. But we should see that our
adherence to our core interests and our determination to protect them do not
get diluted by any tendency towards romanticisation of China. ( 10-7-12)
( The writer is Additional Secretary (retd),
Cabinet Secretariat, Govt of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director,
Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate, Chennai Centre For China
Studies. E-Mail: seventyone2@gmail.com . Twitter: @SORBONNE75 )
