B.RAMAN
A controversy has arisen over the expenditure
incurred by the Government of India on the foreign travels of Mrs.Sonia Gandhi,
the leader of the Congress.
2. Mrs.Gandhi is a Member of the Lok Sabha and the
head of the Congress. In either of these capacities, she often travels inside
India as well as abroad. In addition to being an MP, she is also the widow of
Rajiv Gandhi, the former Prime Minister. By virtue of that, protecting her from
any threat to her physical security, whether in India or abroad, is the
responsibility of the Special Protection Group
(SPG) of the Cabinet Secretariat. She is what is called an SPG protectee
and is covered under the SPG Act.
3.Providing SPG protection to her during her
travels involves two responsibilities--- deputing a team of close-proximity
guards of the SPG to protect her at her place of stay and during her movements
and liaising with the local security authorities.
4.The SPG would have been authorised to incur the
following expenditure on her foreign travels:
( a ).Expenditure on the air travel and hotel stay
of the SPG guards accompanying her.
( b ).Expenditure on the vehicles that would have
been hired for her movements in the place visited by her.
5. These are legitimate items of expenditure and
nobody can object to it. Does the public have a right to know this expenditure?
Yes it has, but not the details of the break-up as that could involve revealing
details regarding the number of close proximity guards accompanying her while
she travels abroad and the kind of special protection vehicles she uses. These
details should not be revealed in the interest of her security.
6. Mrs.Sonia Gandhi faces a high degree of threat to her physical
security from the remnants of the Khalistani terrorists and the overseas
sympathisers of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. The incident in London on
the night of September 30,2012, in which a senior retired officer of the Army,
who had played a role in Operation Blue Star in the Amritsar Golden Temple in
1984, was attacked by as yet unidentified elements, indicates the danger and
possibility of such threats being still alive.
7. The SPG unit responsible for her protection
cannot afford to take risks with her security. Whatever, in their assessment,
needs to be done for her security has to be done and the necessary expenditure
incurred.
8. There is also a non-security related expenditure
on her travels abroad. This would consist of the expenditure on her air travel
and hotel stay and medical treatment. There would be no dilution of her
security by revealing these details. The Government should not make an
unnecessary issue of revealing them. The credibility of the Government, the
Congress and Mrs.Sonia Gandhi would go up if the Government takes the
initiative in revealing them.
9.In the case of Mrs.Sonia Gandhi, who is an SPG
protectee, the drill is clearly laid down. When the Chief Minister of a State
travels abroad, whether on private or official duty, the drill for his or her
security, is not clearly laid down in matters such as under what head the
expenditure on the security will be incurred, who will handle the security
liaison with the local security agencies and what precautions are to be taken
to prevent the penetration of the security party by the foreign agencies.
10. For example, Shri Narendra Modi, the Chief
Minister of Gujarat, paid a high profile visit to China with an entourage. From
the point of view of our national security, China is a sensitive country. Who
handled the security aspect of the visit? Who handled the liaison with the Chinese
security agencies? Were the Government of India and the Intelligence Bureau
kept in the picture regarding any interactions with the Chinese security
agencies in connection with Shri Modi’s visit? What expenditure was incurred on
Shri Modi’s security? How and under which head it was met? Was a report sent to
the Intelligence Bureau on Shri Modi’s return on all contacts with the Chinese
security agencies for arranging for his security?
11. The credibility of the BJP and Shri Modi will
go up if he and his Government shares these details with the public. ( 2-10-12)
(The writer
is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi,
and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate
of the Chennai Centre For China Studies. E-mail: seventyone2@gmail.com Twitter @SORBONNE75)
2 comments:
Mr. Raman,
Call me biase, but as an MP and just head of congress party, may be she incurred protection but its not ethical. WHY DURING EVERY SESSION OF PARLIAMENT SHE RAN AWAY ON THE PRIVATE CAUSE OF HEALTH. wHY SUDDENLY AFTER HER COME BACK FROM USA, FDI WAS ENACTED. WHOM SHE IS MEETING?. AS A MERE CONGRESS PARTY LEADER, IT SEEMS SHE IS MEETING WITH US CORPORATES AND US POLITICAL SYSTEM? PEOPLE HAVE ASKED QUESTION ABOUT HER VISIT, FIRST LET YOU CAN ANSWER ON HER BEHALF AND THEN ASK FROM MR MODI. HALF OF INDIA IS BEING KNOWING WHO IS SELLING NATION AND WHO IS MAKING IT STRONG ? ALL INDIA TO BE AWARED, THAT OUR YOUTH LAST 20 YEARS HARDSHIP MONEY, SHE IS WASTING ON NREGA SCHEME AND NOW INDIA IS STILL WHERE SHE STARTED. LOOK ON MODI , HOW AN STATE IS PROGRESSING. SEEMS THIS IS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CIA AND RAW. LOOK CIA THEY BUIOLT THEIR EMIRES ON COMMERCE. AND YOU ON JUST ANALYSYS AND CREATING YAKSHAP-OPRANSHNAWALI. JUST ON THE REASON OF SECURITY, DO NOT SHARPEN YOUR LAMPS OF KNOWLEDGE TO PROTECT HER.
During UPA 1, Sonia Gandhi was given a corporate jet to fly to St. Petersburg. The purpose of her visit was not disclosed. But it was reported that she met Ottavio Quattrochhi, the Italian businessman and arms dealer, who had fled from India after facong prosecution for being the Gandhi family's intermediary in a graft case involving Indian purchase of Bofors howitzers. It could well be a "private visit". But, considering that the exchequer had to pay for the SPG cover,a citizen has a right to know who all did meet Sonia Gandhi, and what reason, in St. Petersburg?
Sumit Mitra
Post a Comment