INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM MONITOR: PAPER NO. 769
B.RAMAN
The media has reported as follows regarding the
arrest of a Bangladeshi national in the US on a charge of plotting to carry out
an act of terrorism on behalf of Al Qaeda in the US:
“Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis, 21, was
arrested on Wednesday (October 17,2012) and faces charges of attempting to use
a weapon of mass destruction and attempting to provide material support to al
Qaeda.
“ Nafis appeared in a Brooklyn court on Wednesday.
The criminal complaint against him said he had entered the United States in
January and that he had said he was in contact with members of al Qaeda
overseas. The complaint said he had travelled by van with a man to a New York
warehouse where Nafis assembled what he thought was a 1,000-pound (450-kg)
bomb.
“ The man he believed to be an accomplice was in
fact an undercover agent working for the FBI and the explosives were not in
working condition. He was arrested later in a hotel . Nafis had been a business
student at North South University, a prestigious private institution in
Bangladesh, before leaving to study computer science in the United States. His
father, a senior vice president of a private bank, said Nafis was the more
religious of his two children, but in no way a fanatic.”
2. Other details available through media briefing
by the US authorities indicate as follows: “ Nafis actively sought out other Al
Qaeda contacts in the US to help him carry out a terror attack. One of the
individuals he had attempted to recruit was a source for the FBI.FBI agents and
the New York Police closely monitored Nafis as he attempted to implement his
plan.” He wanted to blow up the Federal Reserve building in New York.
3. Even though the criminal complaint filed against
Nafis in the Brooklyn court alleged that he “was in contact with members of Al
Qaeda overseas”, no details of these contacts have been given. All that one
knows is that Nafis wanted to recruit a person in New York, who was, in fact, a
source of the FBI. He reported the matter to the FBI and on their instructions
introduced Nafis to an FBI operative.
4. It would seem that all the subsequent meetings
of Nafis were with this FBI operative
who posed as close to Al Qaeda and that this FBI operative arranged for him
what he described as explosives which, in fact, were not. All the discussions
of Nafis took place not with an Al Qaeda member, but with the FBI operative who
posed as an Al Qaeda facilitator. It is not clear to what extent the ideas for
the attack such as the selection of the target etc came from Nafis and to what
extent these were planted in his mind by the FBI operative in order to make out
a case for arresting him.
5. No other arrests have been made. This would
indicate that he was not part of any terrorist sleeper cell. The FBI has not
produced any evidence so far to show that Nafis was already in touch with Al
Qaeda when he was in Bangladesh or that he had travelled to Pakistan to meet
jihadi terrorists for undergoing any training. This is not the way Al Qaeda
operates----send a novice without any training to the US to procure explosives
and blow up important buildings.
6. This appears to be one of those counter-terrorism
sting operations being used by the FBI since 9/11 for preventing identified
elements with a radical bent of mind from taking to terrorism. It is quite
likely the FBI will keep him in custody for some months, enter into a plea
bargain with him under which he will be made to confess before the court, get
him sentenced and then deport him to Bangladesh on the ground that he
co-operated with the FBI in the investigations.
7.Such counter-terrorism sting operations as a way
of controlling terrorism are not encouraged by courts in other countries, but
in the US convictions are awarded by courts in such operations despite their
dubious legality.
8. One should not over-state the significance of
this arrest. (19-10-12)
(The writer
is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi,
and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate
of the Chennai Centre For China Studies. E-mail: seventyone2@gmail.com Twitter @SORBONNE75)
1 comment:
Sir,
Sting operations,such as this, have their own limited usefulness and of course should not be over stated as you have rightly pointed out but many such operations (in the US) have netted budding aspirants to serious crime (including terrorism)and even have sometimes tripped up leads to international networks of drug runners etc. Mounting such sting operations (in India) may not be possible, generally,owing to a perennial shortage of manpower in the Police and Intelligence agencies and also the budget for such operations are hard to come by.The flip side of venturing into such sting operations here(in India) is that quite a significant number of innocent ( by "innocent", I mean people who may be harboring terrorist ideas only in their minds but may not have the wherewithal or the contacts to put it to work)people might be led into traps laid by overzealous personnel for enhancing their own careers and records.
Post a Comment