B.RAMAN
Maya Mirchandani of NDTV had an interesting
discussion on the Hindu citizens of Pakistan on the night of August 11,2012.
She needs to be complimented for focussing with finesse and delicacy on this
sensitive issue in the context of the recent arrival of a large number of Hindu
citizens of Pakistan in India for doing their annual pilgrimage to the Hindu
holy places.
2.The Indian visa rules relating to Pakistan permit
group pilgrimages by the Hindus as well as Muslims and individual family visits
to India. Both Hindus and Muslims avail of the rules relating to pilgrimages
and the Mohajirs, who migrated from India, avail of the rules relating to
family visits. The Hindu pilgrimage groups generally come to India around
Janmashtami, visit a number of holy places and go back to Pakistan.
3. The Hindu pilgrimage visits this year acquired
sensational (to us) and worrisome ( to Pakistan Government) connotations because
of reports in some sections of the Pakistani media that some of the Hindus from
Sindh are actually fleeing from Pakistan because of various forms of harassment
and may not come back.
4. This is a sensitive question. It would have been
better if Maya and her reporters had not posed it to some of the pilgrims in
front of the cameras. It was obvious from their replies that they were in two
minds and had not decided what they should do. They have kept open the
possibility of their going back to Pakistan. If they did, their answers could
be exploited by the Islamic fundamentalist elements to harass and intimidate
them when they return. The threat to the Hindus of Pakistan is from the Islamic fundamentalist elements and the
inability of the Pakistan State, particularly its Police, to control the
fundamentalist elements and protect the Hindus from harassment and intimidation
by the fundamentalists.
5. This harassment is high particularly in the case
of the Dalits, who constitute the majority of the Hindu community, and even
more particularly Hindu women. Some women are forced to embrace Islam and marry
Muslims. There are also instances of the fundamentalist elements seizing the
land and other property attached to Hindu temples in the rural areas without
the Police intervening to stop it. There are also instances of well-to-do
Hindus, many of them belonging to the
so-called upper castes, being harassed and intimidated in relation to their
property by the fundamentalists without the police protecting them. They come
away to India and seek political asylum. It is the poor Dalits who suffer in
silence because they find it difficult to come away to India and seek asylum
.They have no relatives or means of livelihood in India.
6.When Pakistan was formed in 1947, there were
millions of Hindus, sons of the Pakistani soil, all over what constitutes
Pakistan of today. Those in Punjab were driven out to India by the Punjabi
Muslims. In the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP)---now called Khyber-
Pakhtoonkwa--- some were driven out by the pro-Muslim League Pashtun Muslims
and some others enjoyed the protection of the Awami National Party of Khan
Abdul Ghaffar Khan and his successors.
7. Even though there were atrocities against the
Hindus in Sindh and Balochistan too, they were not comparable to the atrocities
on the Hindus in Punjab. While a large number of Hindus from Sindh and
Balochistan came away because of the atrocities of the fundamentalists, some
who enjoyed the protection of India-friendly nationalist parties stayed behind
and were protected by the nationalists.
8. After the death of Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti, a
Baloch nationalist leader, at the hands of the Pakistan Army in August 2005,
the harassment of the Hindus of Balochistan by the security agencies as well as
the fundamentalist elements increased because of suspicion of their sympathy
for the Baloch nationalists who have launched a new freedom struggle after the
murder of Nawab Bugti by the Army. As a result, many Hindus of Balochistan have
either come away to India or shifted to Sindh.
9. The main concentration of Hindus in Pakistan
today is in Sindh. Pakistan has not had an accurate census since the birth of
Bangladesh in 1971. One does not know exactly how many Hindus are there in
Sindh. There are varying estimates between one and four million. These are not
descendants of Hindus who migrated from the rest of India. Barring those who
came from Balochistan, these are the sons and daughters of the Sindhi soil, the
descendants of Hindus who were living in Sindh long before Islam came there and
have proudly remained devoted to their Hindu religion and culture despite all
the harassment they have faced since the birth of Pakistan in 1947. The Hindus
of Sindh are the original Sindhis and not the Muslims, but they are treated as
second class citizens in their own homeland.
10. The Government of India’s interest and
responsibility for ensuring the welfare of the Sindhi Hindus arises from the
fact that they are Hindus. The Nehru-Liaquat Ali Pact signed in April 1950
after Pakistan was born gave the Government of India a locus standi for looking
after the welfare of the Hindus and Sikhs all over Pakistan. The Government of India was
not able to adequately exercise this responsibility in respect of Pakistani
Punjab, the NWFP (now called KP) and Balochistan because it did not have a consular
presence in any of these areas.
11. But till 1994, the Government of India did have
a Consulate in Karachi, which used to, inter alia, monitor the welfare of the
Sindhi Hindus. The Consulate also closely interacted with the Sindhi
nationalist parties and the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), which had many Hindu
cadres, and persuaded them to pay better attention to the protection of the
Hindus.
12. In 1994, Benazir Bhutto, then Prime Minister,
on the advice of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), ordered the Consulate
to close down. The result: Our ability to monitor the welfare of the Sindhi
Hindus has been affected. Moreover, after Rajiv Gandhi and Narasimha Rao,
successive Governments that held office in
New Delhi have neglected our past policy of active interaction with the
Sindhi nationalists, who are the well-wishers of India and the Sindhi Hindus.
Our hopes and those of the Sindhi Hindus that a PPP Government will better
protect their rights have been belied. The PPP has given ministerial berths to
some of its Hindu members, but there is a feeling that they have not done much
to protect the Hindu community.
13. There are limits to what the Government of
India can do to protect the Hindus except periodically exercising pressure on Islamabad to look after them and
protect them from the fundamentalists. Whatever limited role the Government of
India could play in the past has been greatly diluted in the absence of a Consulate in Karachi and
the drying-up of our interactions with the Sindhi nationalists, the traditional
opponents of the fundamentalists and protectors of the Hindus in whatever
limited way they can.
14. Since 1994, from time to time, the Government
of India has taken up with Islamabad the question of its re-opening the
Consulate in Karachi. As a quid pro quo, Pakistan has reportedly been insisting
on a Pakistani Consulate in Mumbai to be located in the Jinnah House. It is
understood that while the Government of India has no objection to a Pakistani
Consulate in Mumbai, it has reservations about its being located in the Jinnah House.
15. The re-opening of the Indian Consulate in
Karachi and better protection for the Hindus and Sikhs living in Pakistan
should be taken up by our Prime Minister with President Asif Ali Zardari. We
should revive our dried-up interactions with the Sindhi nationalists. We should
also examine whether the Nehru-Liaquat Ali Pact needs updating. ( 13-8-12)
( The writer is Additional Secretary (retd),
Cabinet Secretariat, Govt of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director,
Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate, Chennai Centre For China
Studies. E-Mail: seventyone2@gmail.com . Twitter: @SORBONNE75 )
2 comments:
Great Analysis Raman
What's funny is that Jinnah house is private property , one which the Pakistani government has absolutely no right. The cheek for them to demand this in reciprocity is hilarious.
Post a Comment