B.RAMAN
All right-thinking persons should be concerned over
the growing negative mood in Indian public opinion.
This started in the wake of the various scams last
year, exposing large-scale corruption and financial irregularities and public
impressions of favouritism in seeking to appoint wrong persons to important
posts such as that of the Chief Vigilance Commissioner.
It got aggravated by the shockingly insensitive
manner in which the Government and some of its senior Ministers handled the
public protest against corruption spearheaded by Anna Hazare and Baba Ramdev
and by the Government’s dragging its feet in pushing though the Lokpal Bill.
The public mood has further worsened due to the
increasingly negative economic indicators relating to inflation, GDP growth
date, industrial production, the value of the rupee etc.
The Chinese economy has also been going through a
bad patch. Its GDP growth rate that used to record 10 per cent plus year after
year for nearly a decade has come down below 10 per cent and has reached a
three-year low of around 8 per cent in the recent quarter. The number of
internal disturbances due to economic factors such as anger in public over
arbitrary ways of acquiring land is increasing. The Chinese Government and
Communist Party are more worried about the dangers of internal instability due
to economic factors than ever before.
There is a negative mood in China too, but that
doesn’t get reflected in its controlled media, but one can see signs of it in
the debates among its rapidly growing community of netizens.
Foreign opinion-makers, who have their own agenda
against India due to factors such as our
Prime Minister’s political weaknesses and constraints, which come in the way of
his pushing ahead with economic reforms, have been wittingly or unwittingly
adding to the negative mood in India by the way they project our Prime Minister
as indecisive, as an underachiever, as a political non-entity etc.
There is a vicious circle of the criticism and
negative projection of the Prime Minister by domestic and foreign analysts
feeding each other.
As a result, the Prime Minister finds himself being
relentlessly stoned by his critics at home as well as abroad.
I have been a strong critic of the Prime Minister
and his weak style of leadership.
I have also been an equally strong critic of his
failure or reluctance to impose his authority on those around him.
His reluctance or inability or both to lead from
the front and take effective charge of the ship of the Indian State has added
to the negative mood.
It is important for the Prime Minister to realise
that ONLY HE and nobody else can arrest this spreading negativism.
This calls for policy initiatives, decision
initiatives and strong activism and leadership assertion.
Initiatives are urgently required in matters such as action against corruption, control of
inflation, pushing through urgently needed economic reforms and repeatedly
engaging with the public instead of continuing to disengage from them.
The Prime Minister continues to lead from inside a
well instead of from the deck of the ship of the Indian State.
His leadership is unfelt, unseen.
His voice is feeble and unheard.
His senior advisers, who are defensive in the face
of increasing public criticism, are letting him down by failing to vigorously
counter the negative mood.
They seem to be thinking: When the Prime Minister
is reluctant to assert himself why should we do so and stick our neck out?
Even some good initiatives taken by the Government
have not been properly projected to the public in matters such as better
handling of counter-terrorism, avoiding the injection of more poison into our
relations with Pakistan and reducing the trust deficit with China.
Even if these initiatives are properly projected to the public, that alone
will not counter the negative public mood unless bread and butter issues are
addressed head-on.
A message has to go to the Indian public that the
Prime Minister is in charge and is determined to reverse the negative public
mood.
It is important for him to be felt.
It is important for him to be respected.
It is important for him to be feared.
Low profile, non-assertive leadership will not
instil confidence in the public.
I had said this before and am saying it again.
The starting point of the exercise towards
leadership assertion has to be vigorous and sustained interactions with carefully
selected sections of our media.
A media kept groping for answers to important
questions of State policy can damage the image of the PM.
That’s is what is happening now.
He should explain his worries, concerns, hopes and
determination to act to the people through the media.
Social networks with periodic Tweets cannot serve
this purpose.
Only frequent face-to-face interviews to important
journalists will help.
We need to see the PM more and more on our TV screens.
We need to see him more and more in newspaper
columns.
We need to see our Prime Minister as a picture of physical and intellectual vigour.
The exercise to use the media for a better
projection of himself , his policies and his hopes and vision for the future has to be accompanied by an exercise to look
for more opportunities to interact directly with the people.
The PM needs a team of imaginative, innovative,
self-confident and positive minded media advisers who will keep the media and
through it the public informed of the policy and decision initiatives of the PM
and his Cabinet.
It is time for the PM to let the word spread that
HE MEANS BUSINESS. (17-7-12)
( The writer is Additional Secretary (retd),
Cabinet Secretariat, Govt of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director,
Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate, Chennai Centre For China
Studies. E-Mail: seventyone2@gmail.com . Twitter: @SORBONNE75 )
3 comments:
High time Prime Minister ManmohanSingh decides to take the average man in the street into his confidence rather than keep his counsel to himself.All big leaders of the past such as Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru always shared ther thoughts,their dreams with the public which then understood what they were doing or intending to do and invariably gave full cooperation to them in achieving their goals.
Today no one knows what is in the minds of the Leaders, be it Sonia Gandhi or Manmohan Singh.
Let Manmohan Singh not keep silent and share his views lest events take him and he is left behind and succeeded by someone more vocal and sharing of dreams with the Aam Janata.
Wrong - a leopard can't change its spots. Time instead to drop the Gandhis and appoint a real strong leader like Pranab Mukherjee instead of sending him into the political wilderness. Better still for the country is an early change of government!
Interesting analysis of what a PM SHOULD do. Correct comment on what this PM CAN do.
Any views on what would be the best course of action / inaction given the prevailing realities?
Post a Comment