Thursday, February 2, 2012



The Supreme Court verdict announced on February 2,2012, on three issues which had come up before it relating to the 2G licences issued by A.Raja, former Telecom Minister, as a member of the Cabinet of Prime Minister Dr.Manmohan Singh, has been greeted with typical bureaucratic rationalisation by the Government, the Congress Party and their spokesmen.

2. The three salient points of the verdict are:

(a). The cancellation by the court of the 122 licences issued by Raja under the first come, first served principle and its directive to issue fresh licences after auctions. This is not a judicial finding on the charges of corruption against Raja for which he is separately under trial, but a finding on the vitiated manner in which the telecom policy was formulated and sought to be implemented by Raja in his capacity as a member of the Cabinet. Thus, by indirect implication, it is a verdict not just against Raja as an individual Minister, but against the Cabinet as a whole and the Prime Minister for the manner in which they functioned or failed to function in matters relating to the award of licences. No amount of bureaucratic rationalisation of the verdict as a disapproval of a policy that has been in existence since 2003 and not of the Cabinet that implemented the policy will convince educated and well-informed sections of the population that while a policy has been discredited, the Government has not been. Dr.Manmohan Singh and his Cabinet stand discredited for the way they allowed Raja to run the Telecom Ministry in an unconstitutional and arbitrary manner according to his own whims and fancies.

(b).The decision of the court not to intervene at this stage in the matter of a CBI enquiry into the allegations of wrong-doing as the former Finance Minister against Shri P.Chidambaram, the present Home Minister. While letting the trial court before which this matter already figures come to a finding, the Supreme Court bench has fixed a time-limit of two weeks for the trial court to reach a conclusion. Thus, the status quo continues at least for two weeks more.

( c ). The decision not to appoint a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to continue to monitor the CBI investigation on behalf of the SC, but to let the Central Vigilance Commissioner, who is already responsible for supervising the work of the CBI, monitor this investigation too.

3. Thus, while the first decision is a serious reflection ---if not a formal indictment--- on the functioning or non-functioning of the Cabinet headed by Dr.Manmohan Singh in matters relating to the award of the licences, the other two decisions need not cause any discomfiture to the Government for the present.

4. One would have expected the Government and the Congress to accept without any attempt at rationalisation or prevarication the negative implications of the SC verdict and set in motion correctives by way of action against Ministers responsible for the conscious distortion of the formulation and implementation of the telecom policy.

5. Instead of doing so, the Government and the Congress have initiated an exercise to claim that there were no policy misdeeds on the part of the Government and that the vitiation of the process for the award of the licences was due to the Government inheriting a policy---since found arbitrary and unconstitutional—from the previous Government headed by Shri Atal Behari Vajpayee.

6. Since we are in the midst of the election campaign in Uttar Pradesh, the Congress would be committing a hara-kiri if the Government were to accept responsibility for the policy misdeeds pointed out by the SC bench. An exercise in rationalisation and prevarication, however unfortunate, was therefore inevitable.

7. The only way of making the Government and the Congress pay a price for their established misdeeds is by making this an electoral issue. The implications of the SC decision have to be explained to the rural voters in a simple language with simple arguments which they can understand. No amount of TV debates in high-flown English with rhetorical arguments and flourishes will make the rural voters realise the gravity of the misdeeds of the Government and the Congress Party.

8. Instead of refashioning their election campaign in an appropriate manner to convince the rural voters, the spokesmen of all opposition parties have been busy scoring TV debating points which is not going to have any impact on the rural voters. The opposition committed a similar mistake after the 26/11 terrorist strikes in Mumbai. Instead of taking the sins of commission and omission of the Govt directly to the people, they took them to the TV studios and anchors. The result: No impact on the election results.

9. The Congress is calculating on the opposition committing a similar mistake this time. It suits the Congress to keep the debate confined to the TV studios. TV debates have some impact on urban, but not rural viewers.

10. If the opposition does not effectively exploit the issue in the election campaign, the Congress is hoping to avoid a rout in the elections and that could be the end of the Government’s and the Congress Party’s discomfiture.

11. In a democracy, the proof of the pudding is in the voting. The Congress understands this better than the opposition. ( 3-2-12)

( The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate of the Chennai Centre For China Studies. E-mail: Twitter : @SORBONNE75 )


Esoteric said...

I also read the SC judgment.In faulting FCFS of UPA it faults the Govt in choosing to continue 2003 policy in a different environment.Ofourse,implmentation was also faulty.

Good for non-congress parties if Cong is unaware of movements at the ground level eg Swami Ramdev or Anna Hazare.80% people will never vote for Cong again...

I always maintained 2012 dec to be the time by which bigwigs will be in jail;events have only confirmed this.30-40 additional seats in UP is all that Cong might have to show in this year.It wont be enough for them to turn things around.

I suggest,we upgrade facilities in places like Tihar(get ACs,good food,security,books n TV etc) so that the corrupt can voluntarily spend 5-15yrs in jail(let it be like house arrest plus confiscation of black money) that they will have to eventually.Ofcourse, the loot has to come back to India also from acounts might take a while but it surely will..

Carlos said...

To Raman: I expect the Congress to win in Punjab, Manipur & Uttarakhand, to form a govt with the SP in UP and narrowly lose to the BJP-MGP in Goa. Corruption in Hindustan is a given.
To Esoteric : Ramdev is a fraud & Hazare is a megalomanic. Neither can win elections otherwise they would be contesting elections not mouthing rubbish.

Carlos said...

Hazare is a megalomaniac. My bad.

ambi said...

carlos the problem with congress is that it has increased the gap between rich and poor greatly. now if it caters the need of poor it affects rich by default. n if it tries to pacify rich it hurts poor. either way .....

dream on about cons winning. just wait n watch. samajwadi in UP!!! Ha ha ha. pig cant fly dude.

n yes corruption in hindustan is given till cons r ruling. not after that.

Carlos said...

To ambi : You think the BJP/RSS is not corrupt ??? Do a google search and check out the HUGE number of scams during 1998-2004 :-)
Hindustan is, by and large, a country filled with chors. Not just the politicians. The bureaucracy, the industrialists, doctors, lawyers, almost everyone at every level is a bloody chor. There are very few honourable exceptions. The RSS is definitely not part of the few honest people/organisations left in this corrupt country.
As far as the election results are concerned wait till the 4th of March and see. Cheers !!

ambi said...

yaar aap nahin manoge. aap ki marzi. i understand ur target on bjp, no problem, what rss has to do with it? of course there must be corruption in RSS, but at what degree.

its like some one alleging vatican behind USA attack on Iraq. What Vatican has to do behind the decision made by one party in usa? Isnt it blood boiling. thats where sonia has gone horribly wrong.

Carlos said...

There is no BJP without the RSS. Don't even pretend there is. They are interchangeable to attempt to fool some gullible people. Frankly, like the "mukhautha" (spelling ??) Govindacharya talked about.
As far as I am concerned, the BJP/RSS/VHP/Bajrang Dal/RamSene/ABVP are ALL THE SAME.
Degree of corruption is only a function of ability & access. A chor is a chor is a chor.
End of topic for me.

ambi said...

Carlos, Yaar app bade ziddi ho. chalo chodo!