Wednesday, July 18, 2012

RECONSTRUCTING ARMY CHANGES IN NORTH KOREA





B.RAMAN


 ( To be read in continuation of my articles of December 19,2011, titled KIM JONG-UN: LITTLE KNOWN RULER OF AN UNPREDICTABLE STATE at http://ramanstrategicanalysis.blogspot.in/2011/12/kim-jong-un-little-known-ruler-of.html      and of April 15,2012,titled Fresh sanctions against N Korea: A serious mistake by US at http://www.rediff.com/news/column/fresh-sanctions-against-n-korea-a-serious-mistake-by-us/20120415.htm )


In my article of April 15,2012, I had written as follows:


“The United States is committing a serious mistake in imposing fresh food sanctions against North Korea for attempting to launch a rocket on April 13.


“The launch -- which the US described as an attempt to test a long-range missile and North Korea projected as an attempt to put a satellite in orbit to mark the 100th anniversary of the birth of his grand-father Kim ul-Sung -- failed.


“It was a double humiliation for North Korea, its leaders and people. The first humiliation arose from the failure of the rocket and the second from the fresh food sanctions sought to be imposed on North Korea at the instance of the US for trying to test the rocket.


“The double humiliation has come at a time when Kim Jong-Un, who succeeded his father as the ruler four months ago, seemed to have consolidated his position. On the eve of the launch, he assumed the posts of the First Secretary of the Korean Workers' Party, the Chairman of the Central Military Commission and the First Chairman of the National Defence Commission, a newly-created post.


“North Korea has had rocket/missile failures in the past which it never admitted to and instead projected as a success. This time, it had to admit the failure, because, in a rare act of transparency in an otherwise closed society, Kim Jong-Un had invited nearly 150 foreign observers for the launch, even at the risk of any failure becoming public knowledge.


“This act of transparency seems to have had two objectives. Firstly, to convince the world that North Korea was placing a satellite for peaceful purposes in orbit and not testing a long-range missile as alleged by the US and South Korea.


“Secondly, it may have been an attempt at opening up of the closed North Korean society.


“This act of transparency required great courage on his part. It should have been rewarded by the opponents of North Korea, led by the US, in order to encourage him to continue on the path of gradually opening up North Korea. Instead, by seeking to strengthen the food sanctions for attempting to launch the rocket, the US is unwittingly proving to the North Korean leadership that its experimenting with transparency was unwise.


“North Korea may now reverse its experimentation with transparency and any hopes of a wind of change in the nation under the new ruler will stand belied. By humiliating Kim in the eyes of his people, the US has lost any chance of experimenting with a new policy which would have had the objective of encouraging Kim Jong-Un to gradually come out of his shell.”


2.A day after the failure, the Chinese Xinhua news agency disseminated the following report from Pyongyang:


“Kim Jong Un, supreme commander of the Korean People's Army (KPA), has ordered promotions for 71 senior military officers, official news agency KCNA reported Saturday.( April 14)


“Kim said the Democratic People's Republic of Korea armed forces had performed great exploits for the party, revolution, country and its people and were now fully demonstrating their strength in the defense of the country and the building of a thriving nation, the report said.


"According to the order, which was issued Friday, Pak Sun Hwan has been promoted to Lieut. General, Kim Yong Hwa, Son Kyong Bok and 68 others to Maj. General.


“Kim said they would creditably discharge their duties as vanguard fighters of the Songun (military first) revolution in the sacred struggle to accomplish the revolutionary cause of Juche generation after generation, true to the behests of Kim Jong Il.


“Juche is a political thesis of Kim Il-sung, founder of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, which says that the Korean masses are the masters of the country's development.


“Kim Jong Un was elected first chairman of the National Defense Commission on Friday. Earlier this week, he was appointed first secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea and chairman of the party's Central Military Commission.”


3. One would have normally expected that the rocket failure could lead to action being taken against those responsible. It didn’t happen. Instead, an unusually large number of officers were promoted .One doesn’t know whether the promotion orders were issued before or after the failure, but the promotions were announced a day after the failure.


4. South Korean media reported on  June 14,2012, that Lt. Gen. Kim Rak Gyom had been appointed commanding officer of the Korean People’s Army [KPA] Strategic Rocket Force Command [SRFC] in early 2012.  Lt. Gen. Kim was later elected a member of the Korean Workers’ Party Central Military Commission [CMC] during the 4th Party Conference on  April 11, 2012.  The existence of the SRFC was first mentioned in a DPRK state media report on  March 2, 2012, when Kim Jong Un  inspected its headquarters near Kangdong County in northeast Pyongyang. The SRFC was reportedly created in 2011 when North Korea consolidated all short-, medium- and intermediate-range missile units into a unified command under the National Defense Commission [NDC].


5.South Korean media speculated that Col. Gen. Choe Sang Ryo, who was the head of the SRFC, might have been removed during the 4th Party Conference in April 2012 and replaced by Kim Rak Gyom.If so, why was he removed? There was no answer.


6.The North Korean State  media reported that a national  meeting was held on  June 18, 2012, to commemorate the 48th anniversary of Kim Jong Il beginning his career in the Korean Workers’ Party Central Committee.   Present at the meeting were   Kim Yong Nam, Choe Yong Rim, Choe Ryong Hae and Ri Yong Ho, members of the Presidium of the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Workers’ Party.  Kim Ki Nam, a member of the Political Bureau and secretary of the Central Committee, submitted a report to the meeting. It described  Kim Jong Un  as the center of the leadership and unity, thereby indicating that the publicly admitted rocket failure had not damaged his position in the Party and the Army.


7. On  July 8,2012,  Kim Jong Un  visited the  War Museum in Pyongyang to mark the 18th anniversary of the death of  Kim Il Sung.  In remarks made during the visit, he emphasised the importance of  the role of the  “youth” and the “generations to come”, indicating he was having in mind the possible future role  of North Korea’s GenNext. That would have been possible only by gradually jettisoning party  and army leaders of the older generation whom he had inherited from his father. Would he have the power to do so and if so, how soon? That was a question that defied analysis in the absence of authentic information from North Korea’s closed society.  Among those who accompanied Kim to the function were Vice Marsha  Kim Jong Gak, VM Choe Ryong Hae, VM Ri Yong Ho and VM Hyon Chol Hae.


8. The Kim Il Sung Youth League [KISYL] held a national conference  at  Pyongyang on  July 12, 2012.The conference had two agenda items, the first of which was an endorsement of the leadership of Kim Jong-Un. The second item approved a change in the designations of the Youth League officials as Chairman and Vice-Chairman instead of as First Secretary and Secretary.


9.The North Korean state media reported on  July 13,2012, that Kim Jong Un had  attended a commemorative photo session with construction workers from the Korean People’s Internal Security Forces [KPISF] .  At the photo op,  Kim Jong Un was joined by Vice Marshal Choe Ryong Hae, Jang Song Taek, Gen. Ri Myong Su, Col. Gen. Ri Pyong Sam, Ri Ryong Ha, Pak Chun Song and “generals of the KPISF.” Ri Yong Ho was not present.


9.Engineers’ units subordinate to KPISF and the Ministry of People’s Security have been responsible for some infrastructure construction, particularly tunnels.  In recent years the KPISF has built or renovated several food production facilities, including the Taedonggang Combined Fruit Farm. 


10. On July 16,2012, the North Korean media reported that Vice Marshal Ri Yong Ho had been removed from all official positions in the party and the Army due to illness. Among the posts held by him at the time of his removal were Chief of the General Staff of the Army and one of the five members of the Standing Committee of the Party Politbureau referred to as the Presidium.  


11.On September 27,2010, Kim Jong Il had issued an order in his capacity of the supreme commander of the Army promoting Ri Yong Ho to the  rank of Vice- Marshal and Kim Jong Un to that of General, a rank  below Vice- Marshal. He also nominated Kim Jong Un and Ri Yong Ho as the two Vice-Chairmen of the Central Military Commission. He did not have Kim Jong Un included in the Presidium of the Party , but he was elected to the party central committee at the Party Congress held on September 28,2010.


12.Thus while inducting Kim Jong Un into the Army and the party Central Committee in order to pave the way for his succeeding him, Kim Jong Il took care not to ruffle the feathers of Ri Yong Ho by giving him a higher position in the party and army leadership.


13. Two others who were given senior positions were Kim Kyong-hui, Kim Jong Il’s 65-year-old sister, and her husband, Jang Song-thaek, both given the rank of four-star Generals. She was elected to the Party Central Committee and Politbureau at the September 28,2010, Party Conference. Kim Song Il also had her husband appointed as the Secretary of the Administrative Department in the Party Headquarters and as one of the four Assistant  Vice-Chairmen of the National Defence Commission of the Government as distinguished from the Central Military Commission of the Party to which he was not nominated. Vice Marshal Ri Yong Ho and Kim Jong Un were nominated as the two Deputy Chairmen  of the National  Defence Commission.


14.Thus, Kim Jong Un inherited from his father on his death a triumvirate of three senior mentors in Party and Army who, his father hoped, would put him through his paces as he consolidated his position in the party and the Army. He succeeded his father as the de facto head of the  party and the Army. By April 12,2012, a day before the unsuccessful rocket test, he had made himself the de jure head by taking over as the  chairman of the National Defense Commission, the  First Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea and Chairman of the party's Central Military Commission.


15. However, his dependence on the triumvirate of senior mentors left behind by his father continued with Jang Song Thaek emerging to the top of the triumvirate. According to  Radiopress of Japan, Kim Jong Un made 81 reported visits during the first six months of 2012 ---  40 of  them Army-connected events and the remaining 41 civilian events. He was escorted by his brother-in-law on 61 occasions.  Second and third to him were VM  Choe Ryong Hae (Director of the Army’s General Political Department) and VM  Ri Yong Ho, both of whom had been nominated by the Party in April,2012, as Vice-Chairmen of the Central Military Commission.


16. On  July 8,2012,  Kim Jong Un had  visited the  War Museum in Pyongyang to mark the 18th anniversary of the death of  Kim Il Sung.  Among those who accompanied him was Vice-Marshal Ri Yong Ho, (aged 70) who appeared to be in good health. Within a week, he was removed from all his posts ostensibly on grounds of illness. What suddenly happened to his health within a week? If he had been taken seriously ill beyond recovery, why didn’t he resign? Why he had to be removed? No explanations were forthcoming from Pyongyang.


17. Immediately after his removal, KCNA reported that Kim Jong Un had sent a message of thanks to soldiers of the North Korean internal security forces for “their tremendous feats in major construction projects.” Kim praised the servicemen for their participation in projects including the construction of the country’s largest hydroelectric power plant, a food processing factory and a university library. This gave rise to speculation that Ri Yong Ho might have opposed the use of the military for civilian construction projects and this might have led to his removal. There is no confirmation of this.


18. On July 17,2012. North Korean Party newspaper Rodong Sinmun announced the promotion of General Hyon Yong-chol to the rank of Vice-Marshal. Little is known about his age, education or background. He was a  Lieutenant- General of the eighth army and  was promoted as General at the September 2010 Workers’ Party meeting, when Kim Jong Un made his debut in the party and the Army.


19.Vice-Marshal Hyon has not yet been designated as the successor of Ri Yong Ho as the Chief of the General Staff, which would make him the head of the Army, which is still without a head. There are four other Vice-Marshals senior to him. A more important person in the Army and Party leadership is  Choe Ryong Hae, the son of Choe Hyon who served as the North’s Defense Minister from 1968 to 1976. In April last, he became a Vice Marshal, a member of the Politburo Presidium of the Workers’ Party Central Committee, a Vice-Chairman of the Central Military Commission, and director of the Army’s General Political Bureau. Choe is considered the third most important person in the leadership as of now after Kim Jong Un and Jang Song Thaek.


20.Both Vice-Marshal Choe and VM Hyon belong to the post-Kim Ul Sung leadership, who owe their rise to Kim Jong-un, but VM Choe is alleged to have divided loyalty to Jang Song Thaek, who seemed to have played a role in his elevation.


21.If Kim Jong Un wanted as the head of the Army someone whose loyalty to him is total, he should prefer Hyon. But he would find it difficult to overlook VM Choe because of the powerful posts held by him since April,2012, and his reputed closeness to Jang Song Thaek.


22. What are the reasons for the sudden changes in the Army leadership---genuine illness of Ri Yong Ho or is there a power struggle which is continuing or has Kim Jong Un been able to assert his leadership and place in position officers totally owing their rise to him?


23. It is difficult to answer. But one thing seems likely. Things have started moving in North Korea--- away from the days of Kim Jong Un’s father. The US, South Korea, Japan and China should let things evolve---hopefully in a positive and more transparent direction, by restraining any urge to exercise pressure on the leadership. Nothing can be more counter-productive than adding to the fears of the new leadership over the intentions and agenda of the outside world.  (18-7-12)


( The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate, Chennai Centre For China Studies. E-Mail: seventyone2@gmail.com . Twitter: @SORBONNE75 )














Monday, July 16, 2012

TIME FOR PM TO STEP FORWARD TO DISPEL SPREADING NEGATIVISM IN PUBLIC MOOD





B.RAMAN

All right-thinking persons should be concerned over the growing negative mood in Indian public opinion.


This started in the wake of the various scams last year, exposing large-scale corruption and financial irregularities and public impressions of favouritism in seeking to appoint wrong persons to important posts such as that of the Chief Vigilance Commissioner.
It got aggravated by the shockingly insensitive manner in which the Government and some of its senior Ministers handled the public protest against corruption spearheaded by Anna Hazare and Baba Ramdev and by the Government’s dragging its feet in pushing though the Lokpal Bill.


The public mood has further worsened due to the increasingly negative economic indicators relating to inflation, GDP growth date, industrial production, the value of the rupee etc.


The Chinese economy has also been going through a bad patch. Its GDP growth rate that used to record 10 per cent plus year after year for nearly a decade has come down below 10 per cent and has reached a three-year low of around 8 per cent in the recent quarter. The number of internal disturbances due to economic factors such as anger in public over arbitrary ways of acquiring land is increasing. The Chinese Government and Communist Party are more worried about the dangers of internal instability due to economic factors than ever before.


There is a negative mood in China too, but that doesn’t get reflected in its controlled media, but one can see signs of it in the debates among its rapidly growing community of netizens.


Foreign opinion-makers, who have their own agenda against  India due to factors such as our Prime Minister’s political weaknesses and constraints, which come in the way of his pushing ahead with economic reforms, have been wittingly or unwittingly adding to the negative mood in India by the way they project our Prime Minister as indecisive, as an underachiever, as a political non-entity etc.


There is a vicious circle of the criticism and negative projection of the Prime Minister by domestic and foreign analysts feeding each other.


As a result, the Prime Minister finds himself being relentlessly stoned by his critics at home as well as abroad.


I have been a strong critic of the Prime Minister and his weak style of leadership.


I have also been an equally strong critic of his failure or reluctance to impose his authority on those around him.


His reluctance or inability or both to lead from the front and take effective charge of the ship of the Indian State has added to the negative mood.


It is important for the Prime Minister to realise that ONLY HE and nobody else can arrest this spreading negativism.


This calls for policy initiatives, decision initiatives and strong activism and leadership assertion.


Initiatives are urgently required in matters  such as action against corruption, control of inflation, pushing through urgently needed economic reforms and repeatedly engaging with the public instead of continuing to disengage from them.


The Prime Minister continues to lead from inside a well instead of from the deck of the ship of the Indian State.


His leadership is unfelt, unseen.


His voice is feeble and unheard.


His senior advisers, who are defensive in the face of increasing public criticism, are letting him down by failing to vigorously counter the negative mood.


They seem to be thinking: When the Prime Minister is reluctant to assert himself why should we do so and stick our neck out?


Even some good initiatives taken by the Government have not been properly projected to the public in matters such as better handling of counter-terrorism, avoiding the injection of more poison into our relations with Pakistan and reducing the trust deficit with China.


Even if these initiatives are  properly projected to the public, that alone will not counter the negative public mood unless bread and butter issues are addressed head-on.


A message has to go to the Indian public that the Prime Minister is in charge and is determined to reverse the negative public mood.


It is important for him to be felt.


It is important for him to be respected.


It is important for him to be feared.


Low profile, non-assertive leadership will not instil confidence in the public.


I had said this before and am saying it again.


The starting point of the exercise towards leadership assertion has to be vigorous and sustained interactions with carefully selected sections of our media.


A media kept groping for answers to important questions of State policy can damage the image of the PM.


That’s is what is happening now.


He should explain his worries, concerns, hopes and determination to act to the people through the media.


Social networks with periodic Tweets cannot serve this purpose.


Only frequent face-to-face interviews to important journalists will help.


We need to see the PM more and more on our TV screens.


We need to see him more and more in newspaper columns.


We need to see our Prime Minister as a picture  of physical and intellectual vigour.


The exercise to use the media for a better projection of himself , his policies and his hopes and vision for the future  has to be accompanied by an exercise to look for more opportunities to interact directly with the people.


The PM needs a team of imaginative, innovative, self-confident and positive minded media advisers who will keep the media and through it the public informed of the policy and decision initiatives of the PM and his Cabinet.


It is time for the PM to let the word spread that HE MEANS BUSINESS. (17-7-12)


( The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate, Chennai Centre For China Studies. E-Mail: seventyone2@gmail.com . Twitter: @SORBONNE75 )

Sunday, July 15, 2012

SPY VS SPY: THE ONE THAT GOT AWAY




B.RAMAN

A spook spends his  working life in a cloistered world---protecting himself, his relatives, his feelings and his joys and sorrows from unwanted curiosity.
The special bonds that one develops in this world last till one makes one’s peace with the Maker.


Amar Bhushan is one of the  officers of the R&AW with whom I developed special bonds of friendship, professional regard and affection.


He joined the Indian Police Service almost a decade after I did and retired from the R&AW 11 years after me.


He was my junior colleague in my division for some  years after he set foot in the organisation. Thereafter, he moved to other divisions with which I had nothing to do, but the special bonds between us remained strong and unrusted.


He was a man of tremendous personal and professional integrity, with an eye for thoroughness in whatever he did---- a professional to his finger tips.


After a  distinguished career during which he became a highly valued expert on Bangladesh, he retired as Special Secretary in 2005.


Amar wore many hats in that capacity. One of them was as the R&AW’s Czar of counter-intelligence responsible for preventing, detecting and neutralising attempts of foreign intelligence agencies to penetrate the R&AW and subvert the loyalty of its officers.


Under that hat, he played a commendable role in detecting, with the help of his junior colleagues, the penetration of the R&AW by the USA’s  Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) through Maj.Rabinder Singh, a retired officer of the Army who joined the organisation in the 1980s.


One does not know when Rabinder became a mole of the CIA? Was he already a mole when he was in the Army? Or was he recruited by the CIA after he joined the organisation? If so, when?


What role his sister, who was a US citizen and who was a US Government public servant, played in facilitating the penetration of the R&AW by the CIA through her brother? Was it wise and professional on the part of the R&AW to have taken into the organisation someone many of whose relatives were US citizens and at least one of whom was a public servant of the US?


What damage did he cause to the organisation and the country during the period he was a CIA mole in the sanctum sanctorum of the R&AW?


Penetration by a foreign intelligence agency is an occupational hazard in the intelligence profession.


Rabinder was not the first mole of the CIA in the Indian intelligence community.


We had another in the Chennai office of the R&AW detected in the 1980s.He was allegedly being run by a CIA officer working under Consular cover in the US Consulate-General in Chennai.


We had one at a very senior level in the Intelligence Bureau detected in the 1990s. If he had not been detected in time,he might have become the head of the IB. A woman officer of the CIA working under cover in the US Embassy in Delhi for maintaining liaison with the Indian intelligence had allegedly become close to him by exploiting her frequent meetings with him for sharing intelligence on counter-terrorism.


We reportedly found a mole even after the detection of Rabinder in the National Security Council Secretariat, which is  part of the Prime Minister’s Office. A woman cyber security expert of the US had allegedly played a role in this case.


These were the detected cases. One does not know how many undetected cases are there.


Of the four detected cases, that of Rabinder was unique. Whereas the other three were detected and acted against without their being able to run away from the country. Rabinder was the one that got away evading the surveillance that had been mounted on him.


His getting away was made possible by the active assistance reportedly given by the CIA to him and his family.


In the other three cases, the CIA merely withdrew its officers working under cover in India after it came to know that its moles in the Indian intelligence community had come under suspicion by the Indian counter-intelligence.


It did not try to help them to get away.


Only in the case of Rabinder, even at the risk of an adverse impact on the State-to-State relations with India, the CIA seems to have moved heaven and earth to help him get away into the safe sanctuary of the US.


Why did it do so? Was it in gratitude for the invaluable services that he might have rendered to the CIA? Or was it due to fears that if arrested and interrogated by the Indian counter-intelligence, he might under duress reveal the identities of other CIA moles in the Indian intelligence community of whom he possibly had knowledge?


So many questions without answers in the public domain.


When Aldrich  Ames, the notorious spy of the KGB in the sanctum sanctorum of the CIA, was detected and arrested in the 1990s, there were detailed enquiries in-house in the CIA as well as by the Congressional oversight committees.


The entire history of Ames as a KGB mole was traced. How was he recruited? How did he manage to evade detection for many years? What were the deficiencies in the CIA’s CI set-up which he and the KGB exploited? What damage did he cause?


Many of the details of these enquiries were made available in the public domain. You can find them in the Congressional records.


In India, any scholar who wants to reconstruct L’Affaire Rabinder Singh on the basis of authentic data will not be able to do so because nothing is available in public domain.


Whatever we have are speculative reports carried by the media.


In this context, one has to welcome reports carried by sections of the media on July 15,2012, that Amar has written a semi-fictional narrative of the case ( Escape To Nowhere), which is being published this week and will be launched in Delhi on July 23.


Knowing the central, active and leading role that Amar played in this case, one can be certain it will not be just a semi-fiction as it has been projected to be.


It will be a critical analysis incognito.


Amar needs to be hailed for writing this. It will be an important contribution to the meagre history of Indian intelligence available in public domain.


It will throw welcome light on a sad chapter in the history of the R&AW.


Strength to you, Amar. (16-7-12)

( The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), R&AW )

UNWISE TO LIFT BAN ON PAK TV PROGRAMMES




B.RAMAN

In 1989, widespread demonstrations, some of them leading to violence, broke out in Jammu & Kashmir against the Government of India.


2.That was the time when East Europe was in turmoil with large-scale demonstrations  against their Communist regimes by the people of the then East Germany, Rumania etc.


3. Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence acquired visuals of these massive demonstrations in East Europe and started beaming them through Pakistani TV to the people of J&K, with appeals to emulate the people of East Europe and come out in the streets to demonstrate against the Government of India.


4. Shri V.P.Singh, the then Prime Minister, and Shri Vinod Pandey, the then Cabinet Secretary, convened an emergency meeting of the Secretaries’ Committee to discuss how to counter this.


5.The head of the R&AW was directed to take whatever measures were necessary to prevent Pakistani TV programmes from being receivable in J&K and authorised to procure the necessary equipment for this purpose. The equipment was acquired on an emergency basis and the Pakistani TV’s  programmes were effectively jammed.


6. Since then, we have been careful to see that Pakistani TV programmes are not receivable in India for the following reasons:

·        

 To prevent dissemination of programmes that could incite sections of our population to violence
·         

To prevent dissemination of wrong information that could cause communal violence.
·         

To prevent attempts to subvert the loyalty of any section of our population to the Government of India.



7.After the 9/11 terrorist strikes in the US, many Governments have armed themselves with powers to ban TV programmes that could tend to incite their population to take to violence or terrorism. For example, there is a ban in many Western countries on the Al-Aqsa TV channel of Hamas.TV channels of Iran are not allowed to be shown in many countries.


8. On July 7,2010, the Agence France Presse (AFP) disseminated the following report: “On July 7, 2010, the French government instructed its broadcasting authority to take Hamas’ Al-Aqsa TV off the air. The satellite channel was broadcast on Eutelsat, a French satellite company headquartered in Paris. French Foreign Ministry spokesman Bernard Valero said that the instruction was given when France received a warning from the European Commission that the channel repeatedly violated European laws by showing programs which incited hatred or violence for reasons of religion or nationality, mostly against Israel and Judaism.”


9. At a time when we are still grappling with  the evil of jihadi terrorism emanating from Pakistan, through State-sponsorship and other means, it will be extremely unwise on our part to  remove existing curbs on the airing of Pakistani TV programmes in India and to allow Pakistani TV channels to beam their programmes to India.


10. Some sections of our media have reported that the Government of India is considering relaxing some of the existing restrictions. Such action will be seriously detrimental to national security and should be opposed by public and political opinion. (15-7-12)


( The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate, Chennai Centre For China Studies. E-Mail: seventyone2@gmail.com . Twitter: @SORBONNE75 )